In Islamic jurisprudence what is the ruling of putting a condition on a contract or agreement?
There are four basic rules for judging the validity of conditions in a contract:
Now a question arises what is the ruling of void condition, whether it invalidates the contract or not?
The answer is that there is a detail about the impacts of void condition. Sometimes a void condition invalidates the contract and sometimes it does not invalidate the contract, however, the condition itself is annulled.
To elaborate this, Islamic jurists and scholars have written that the compensation (Uqood Muawadha) like sale, purchase, lease agreements become void by putting void condition. However, non-compensatory (voluntarily) agreements (Uqood Ghair Muawadha) like contract of loan (Qard-e-Hasanah), do not become void because of void condition. The void condition, however, becomes itself ineffective. For example if 'A' gives to 'B' a loan with a condition of premium at the time of repayment, this condition of interest is void. However, this condition does not invalidate the contract, therefore all transaction done by this borrowed money, will be valid. But the condition of interest itself is revoked; therefore ‘B’ is not liable for the payment of interest.
Rights, Responsibility and Obligation in a contract:
In Islamic Fiqh, some contracts are such that rights and obligations are also attached to the Agent doing the contract on behalf of the Contracting Party eg. Sales Contract, Ijara, Istisna, Salam etc. While in others Principal has all the responsibilities, rights & obligations eg. Nikah.